inland empire

is it good? what's it like? is it better than his other films? What does it mean? what's it about? what did it make you think of? well firstly the possibility of digital film. The fact that we have no excuses. Secondly I felt that inland empire was a film trying so hard not to be a film. thirdly I would love to know what filters Lynch uses in order to arrive at the images that we see. Composition is always strong. Dialogue is.......wooden, but in the hands of a proffessional actor come across. With the right commitment and filters and a little bit of money its possible to make a film outside of the main stream. This means nothing unless you have a marketing bulldozer to plough through all the shit between you and that big screen.

Conclusion:David Lynch is a marketing mans wet dream.

Oh yes, I was suddenly struck by the lynchian quality of these three mills and boon covers. Perhaps we should make a film using the mills and boon filter?